Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIARYCZOWER, Matias
dc.contributor.authorMATTOZZI, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-15T10:07:15Z
dc.date.available2014-01-15T10:07:15Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Politics, 2013, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 743-756en
dc.identifier.issn1468-2508
dc.identifier.issn0022-3816
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/29244
dc.descriptionPublished online: 28 May 2013.en
dc.description.abstractWe link the intensity of campaign competition in different electoral systems with the number of candidates running for public office and their ideological differentiation. We show that proportional elections have more candidates, competing less aggressively in campaign spending, than those in majoritarian elections. Candidates’ ideological positions, however, can in general be more differentiated in majoritarian or proportional elections. We also study the equilibrium effects of plurality premiums and the consequences of heterogeneity among candidates in nonideological characteristics.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Politicsen
dc.titleOn the nature of competition in alternative electoral systemsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0022381613000583
dc.identifier.volume75en
dc.identifier.startpage743en
dc.identifier.endpage756en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record