Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFABBRINI, Federico
dc.contributor.authorLARIK, Joris
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-29T09:49:51Z
dc.date.available2014-01-29T09:49:51Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/29578
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the dialogue between the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights regarding due process rules in the context of targeted anti-terror sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council. By analysing the references that the two courts make to each other’s case law in the recent landmark decisions in Nada and Kadi II, the paper argues that the rivalling yet constructive relationship between CJEU and the ECtHR has played a key role in re-adjusting the balance between international security and fundamental rights in Europe. As the paper suggests, the looming accession of the EU to the ECHR influences the interaction between the two courts, and is already palpable in the case law of both.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLeuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013/125en
dc.relation.urihttp://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/publications/working_papers/new_series/wp121-130/wp125-larik-fabbrini.pdfen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleDialoguing for due process : Kadi, Nada, and the accession of the EU to the ECHRen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record