Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-18T11:22:07Z
dc.date.available2014-03-18T11:22:07Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationGiorgio BONGIOVANNI, Giovanni SARTOR and Chiara VALENTINI (eds), Reasonableness and law, New York: Springer, 2009, Law and Philosophy Library, 86, pp. 17-68en
dc.identifier.isbn9781402084997
dc.identifier.isbn9781402085000
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/30407
dc.description.abstractI shall argue for a sufficientist understanding of reasonableness in legal decision-making: cognitive or moral optimality are not required for reasonableness; what needed is just that a determination—be it epistemic or practical—is sufficiently good (acceptable, or at least not unacceptable). Correspondingly, judicial review on the ground of unreasonableness requires more than mere suboptimality: it requires failure to achieve the reasonableness threshold.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleA sufficientist approach to reasonableness in legal decision-making and judicial reviewen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-4020-8500-0_2
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record