Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVEGA, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-21T10:36:35Z
dc.date.available2014-03-21T10:36:35Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 96-118en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/30542
dc.description.abstractBudget stability seems to be mainly regulated through hard law, but in order to measure public debt, Eurostat has had to complement many aspects with informal instruments such as decisions in press releases, manuals, recommendations or decisions on particular cases contained in letters to the national statistical authorities. The aim of this paper is to analyse the legal status of these instruments and to comment on their main limitations. In order to do this, we will focus on the case of public-private partnerships, which have frequently been criticised for being used to hide public debt and whose accounting treatment on or off the government’s balance sheet depends mainly on the criteria published by Eurostat.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleEurostat, soft law and the measurement of public debt : the case of public-private partnershipsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume6en
dc.identifier.startpage96en
dc.identifier.endpage118en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record