Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorØSTHUS, Hanne
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-04T13:40:28Z
dc.date.available2014-04-04T13:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2013en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/30901
dc.descriptionDefence date: 16 December 2013en
dc.descriptionExamining Board: Professor Bartolomé Yun-Casalilla, European University Institute, (Supervisor); Professor Hilde Sandvik, University of Oslo (External Supervisor); Professor Ida Bull, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Professor Luca Molà, European University Institute.
dc.descriptionPDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the relationship between masters and domestic servants in Copenhagen and Christiania between 1750 and 1850. Living and working together, their relationship was structured around a contract between two individuals and at the same time specific norms dictating the master's responsibility for his servant's moral and physical well-being. In turn, the servant was instructed to be deferential and respectful. I examine how the relationship between master and servant was legitimized, enforced and contested in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, a time of economic, political and societal change. In the thesis, I argue that the master-servant relationship was transformed during the period 1750 to 1850. Hiring contracts became shorter, preoccupation with family life cast servants as outsiders and an increasing separation of work and home life relegated them to the realm of what came to be categorized as private, while they still continued to be contracted labour. At the same time, servants in Copenhagen and Christiania were waged workers throughout the period 1750 to 1850, and there seem to have been little indication that either masters, mistresses or the servants themselves viewed the servants as integrated members of the family. Yet, throughout the century between 1750 and 1850 there was a continued emphasis on the servant's subordination, and language that stressed their subjugated status in the household persisted in law, in civil lawsuits between masters and servants and in fiction and prose on domestic service throughout the period 1750 to 1850. But while the fact that servants were subordinate members of a household subject to the authority of the master as well as hired help often working on contracts of six months or less was not perceived as contradictory in 1750, it came to be so by 1850. By the late eighteenth century legal minds began to struggle with whether legislation on the master-servant relationship should be classified as a contractual law or family law. It became a problem of taxonomy; a problem that continued to manifest itself during the nineteenth century when work and family came to be perceived as increasingly separate.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHECen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhD Thesisen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subject.lcshMaster and servant -- Copenhagen (Denmark) -- History -- 18th century
dc.subject.lcshMaster and servant -- Copenhagen (Denmark) -- History -- 19th century
dc.subject.lcshMaster and servant -- Oslo (Norway) -- History -- 18th century
dc.subject.lcshMaster and servant -- Oslo (Norway) -- History -- 19th century
dc.subject.lcshCopenhagen (Denmark) -- Social conditions -- 18th century
dc.subject.lcshCopenhagen (Denmark) -- Social conditions -- 19th century
dc.subject.lcshOslo (Norway) -- Social conditions -- 18th century
dc.subject.lcshOslo (Norway) -- Social conditions -- 19th century
dc.titleContested authority : master and servant in Copenhagen and Christiania, 1750-1850en
dc.typeThesisen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record