Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKIRCHNER, Emil J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-10T07:36:15Z
dc.date.available2014-04-10T07:36:15Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/31117
dc.description.abstractIt is the aim of this paper is to explore the role pivotal states play as security providers and what impact they have in particular on regional security governance. The choice to base the analysis at the regional level is due to the relative stability some regions have been able to achieve and the way regional (in)stability can be seen as a sub-set of global governance. The paper will make use of the concept of security governance. Given the growing interaction between national and regional actors in the decision making of regional security governance, a state-centric approach is insufficient as a framework of analysis. Security governance covers threats that have to do with potential or actual violence: terrorism, war and counter insurgency, ethnic cleansing, the spread of weapons of mass destruction, massive human rights violence, and organised crime, as well as issues that have to do with natural disasters: famines, pandemics, cyber warfare, and even financial crises.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2014/40en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-97en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean, Transnational and Global Governanceen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectRegional security governanceen
dc.subjectPivotal statesen
dc.subjectInternational organizationsen
dc.subjectRegional organizationsen
dc.titleTheoretical debates on regional security governanceen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record