Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBUNEA, Adriana
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-31T12:59:11Z
dc.date.available2014-07-31T12:59:11Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJournal of common market studies, 2014, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 1224–1241en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/32292
dc.descriptionPublished online: 3 April 2014en
dc.description.abstractWhy do some interest groups express more policy preferences than others during open consultations organized by the European Commission? This article examines this question by testing an explanatory framework that emphasizes the inter-organizational context in which lobbying takes place and interest groups' resource endowment. The empirical analysis focuses on environmental policy-making. The findings show that interest groups' preference articulation behaviour is largely influenced by the number of inter-organizational linkages they have with other stakeholders. Resource endowment matters in that resource-rich interest organizations are found to be less likely to articulate their preferences via open consultations. Interest groups' organizational form is also a relevant predictor of the likelihood they articulate preferences: in consultations, European federations voice more preferences than national or individual organizations.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of common market studiesen
dc.titleExplaining interest groups' articulation of policy preferences in the European Commission's open consultations : an analysis of the environmental policy areaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcms.12151
dc.identifier.volume52en
dc.identifier.startpage1224en
dc.identifier.endpage1241en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue6en
dc.twitterfalse


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record