| dc.contributor.author | KILPATRICK, Claire | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-04T16:34:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-12-04T16:34:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | International journal of comparative labour law and industrial relations, 2014, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 293-318 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0952-617X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/33685 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This analysis argues that over the last decade strike law has become polycentric in Europe. Having explained why, it examines the impact of this new polycentricity on the previously nationally determined UK strike law settlement. It then explores the fragile bases of polycentric strike law in the UK. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International journal of comparative labour law and industrial relations | |
| dc.title | Has polycentric strike law arrived in the UK? : after Laval, after Viking, after Demir? | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 30 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 293 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 318 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |