Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDUMBROVSKY, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorPETKOVA, Bilyana
dc.contributor.authorVAN DER SLUIS, Marijn
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T18:00:00Z
dc.date.available2014-12-19T18:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationCommon market law review, 2014, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 455-482
dc.identifier.issn0165-0750
dc.identifier.issn1875-8320
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/33950
dc.description.abstractThis article assesses recent reforms of the appointment procedure for members of the Court of Justice and the General Court. We evaluate the effects of the establishment of the Article 255 TFEU Panel. Next to a discussion on the transparency of the Panel's opinions, the criteria set and the role it plays in reappointments, we present case studies of the selection procedure in fourteen Member States, representing new and old, and small and large Member States. Our analysis shows that far from being a paper tiger, the Article 255 TFEU Panel has proven to have a significant impact: it has had a chilling effect on a number of national nominations but also indirectly influenced the selection processes in some Member States, thus limiting arbitrariness. However, opening up judicial appointments to scrutiny at both the EU and the national level has resulted in a subtle move into the direction of judicial self-government.
dc.language.isoEn
dc.publisherKluwer Law Int
dc.relation.ispartofCommon market law review
dc.titleJudicial appointments : the article 255 TFEU advisory panel and selection procedures in the Member States
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.startpage455
dc.identifier.endpage482
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record