| dc.contributor.author | WEILER, Joseph H. H. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-19T18:00:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-12-19T18:00:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | International journal of constitutional law (I-CON), 2014, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 94-103 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1474-2640 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1474-2659 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/34034 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This essay examines, first, the reasons for the extraordinary impact and iconic status which are attached to Van Gend en Loos. It argues that the explanation lies in a confluence of structural factors and not in the "direct effect" doctrine simpliciter. It then looks at the "darker" side of the case-a proxy for governance-its contribution to a European narrative of efficiency which disregards the traditional mechanism of democratic legitimacy. | |
| dc.language.iso | En | |
| dc.publisher | Oxford Univ Press | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International journal of constitutional law (I-CON) | |
| dc.subject | Constitution | |
| dc.title | Van Gend en Loos : the individual as subject and object and the dilemma of European legitimacy | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/icon/mou011 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 12 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 94 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 103 | |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |