Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMCCREA, Ronan
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-13T15:28:42Z
dc.date.available2015-01-13T15:28:42Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationModern Law Review, 2014, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 277-291en
dc.identifier.issn1468-2230
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/34151
dc.descriptionArticle first published online on March 3, 2014
dc.description.abstractThe European Court of Human Rights judgment in Eweida and Others v United Kingdom dealt with the increasingly controversial questions of religious symbols at work and the clash between free conscience and anti-discrimination norms. In a change of approach, it held that the right to resign could no longer be seen as adequate protection for religious freedom and that workplace norms that restrict religious liberty must satisfy a proportionality test. However, it accorded a wide margin of appreciation to States in reconciling freedom of conscience and freedom from discrimination, ruling that the importance of non-discrimination could justify a failure to exempt a religious individual from complying with a policy forbidding discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofModern Law Reviewen
dc.titleReligion in the workplace : Eweida and others v United Kingdomen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-2230.12066
dc.identifier.volume77en
dc.identifier.startpage277en
dc.identifier.endpage291en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record