| dc.contributor.author | GOVERNATORI, Guido | |
| dc.contributor.author | OLIVIERI, Francesco | |
| dc.contributor.author | ROTOLO, Antonino | |
| dc.contributor.author | SCANNAPIECO, Simone | |
| dc.contributor.author | SARTOR, Giovanni | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-19T17:31:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-01-19T17:31:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rinke HOEKSTRA (ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX 2014), Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2014, pp. 81-90 | en |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781614994671 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781614994688 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/34237 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In strategic argumentation players exchange arguments to prove or reject a claim. This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: whether such games can be reasonably modelled as zero-sum games and as games with complete information. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.title | Two faces of strategic argumentation in the law | en |
| dc.type | Contribution to book | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-81 | |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |