Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGRIMMEL, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T13:49:27Z
dc.date.available2015-01-27T13:49:27Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 61-83en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/34385
dc.description.abstractWhat characterises the EU today is that it is not only a multi-level governance system, but also a multi-context system. The making of Europe does not just take place on different levels within the European political framework, executed and fostered by different groups of actors or institutions. Rather, it also happens in different and distinguishable social contexts – distinct functional, historical, and local frameworks of reasoning and action – that political science alone cannot sufficiently analyse with conventional and generalising models of explanation. European law is one such context, and it should be perceived as a self-contained sphere governed by a specific rationality that constitutes a self-generating impetus for integration. By way of re-examining the much-debated ‘foundational period’ of the CJEU’s jurisdiction, it will be shown here that only by analysing the context of European law as an independent space of reasoning and action can the role of Europe’s high court in the process of integration be adequately captured.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.title‘This is not life as it is lived here’ : the European Court of Justice and the myth of judicial activism in the foundational period of integration through lawen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume7en
dc.identifier.startpage61en
dc.identifier.endpage83en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record