Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorANDRESEN, Joshua
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T14:40:27Z
dc.date.available2015-01-27T14:40:27Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 19-35en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/34393
dc.description.abstractContrary to the common claim that jus in bello proportionality is an obscure and intractable principle of modern warfare, this paper shows that proportionality balancing has a central role to play in assuring efficient military operations with a minimum number of casualties. Military commanders can and should want to understand proportionality as a requirement to measure military advantage in terms of lives saved and direct their operations toward the most life-saving operations. The targeted killing context in particular highlights the advantage of making proportionality analysis a central component of military strategy in asymmetrical conflicts.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleChallenging the perplexity over jus in bello proportionalityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume7en
dc.identifier.startpage19en
dc.identifier.endpage35en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record