| dc.contributor.author | KILPATRICK, Claire | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-28T15:39:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-01-28T15:39:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | European Constitutional Law Review, 2014, Vol. 10 , No. 3, pp. 393-421 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1744-5515 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1574-0196 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/34405 | |
| dc.description | Published online : 26 January 2015 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | European Union's ‘social constitution’ and bailout measures – Are the bailout measures EU law? – Do the bailout measures create legal obligations? – Legal nature of Memoranda of Understanding – Avenues for challenge – Call for recognition of the EU law nature of bailouts and the costs of such non-recognition | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | European Constitutional Law Review | en |
| dc.title | Are the bailout measures immune to EU social challenge because they are not EU Law? | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S1574019614001308 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 10 | en |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 393 | en |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 421 | en |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en |