Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMICKLITZ, Hans-Wolfgang 
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-30T14:26:45Z
dc.date.available2015-01-30T14:26:45Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (MJ), 2014, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 589-596en
dc.identifier.issn1023-263X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/34417
dc.description.abstractIn the last couple of years the market for academic legal books and law journals has been flooded with contributions on legal methodology. Most of them are written in English. This does not mean that the debate is bound to the common law, or that only English publishing houses and English journals are involved. The choice of language is nothing more than a further proof that English has long had the status of lingua franca in our academic discourse.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIntersentia
dc.relation.ispartofMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (MJ)- Intersentiaen
dc.titleGuest editorial : on the politics of legal methodologyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume4en
dc.identifier.startpage589en
dc.identifier.endpage596en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record