Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWRIGHT, Andrew Saengpim
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-09T10:41:22Z
dc.date.available2019-09-20T02:45:11Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2014en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/34558
dc.descriptionAward date: 28 November 2014en
dc.descriptionSupervisor: Prof. Stefan Grundmann, European University Institute
dc.description.abstractThis preliminary reference question of the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf in Fra.bo is as typical as it is revealing. Typical, as an imprecise empirical glance at the development of the jurisprudence of the Court reveals that the form of the question – is such and such a provision of EU law to be interpreted as meaning so and so – has become standardized. Revealing, as it shows interpretation to be at the very heart of the Court’s activities – indeed it is its institutional task – and that this is recognized and acknowledged by other actors such as national courts.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLLM Thesisen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleCreation, evolution etc.… theoretical and interdisciplinary perspectives on the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the European Unionen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.identifier.doi10.2870/3681
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.embargo.terms2018-11-28


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record