Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCASAL BÉRTOA, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-19T16:09:50Z
dc.date.available2015-02-19T16:09:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationParty politics, 2014, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 16-36en
dc.identifier.issn1460-3683
dc.identifier.issn1354-0688
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/34718
dc.descriptionFirst published on 14 February 2012.en
dc.description.abstractSince Lipset and Rokkan (1967) published their seminal work on the importance of social cleavages for the ‘freezing’ of party systems more than forty years ago, much has been written on the field demonstrating or discrediting the original hypothesis. In the current article, I examine how cleavage formation and development have influenced the different levels of institutionalization in four new post-communist party systems (i.e. Visegrad). Analysing distinct hypotheses, I arrive at the conclusion that neither the number nor the type nor the strength of a cleavage is associated with the degree of party system institutionalization in East Central Europe. On the contrary, the main conclusion is that party system institutionalization in these democracies has been determined by the way cleavages are structured. In particular, the process of party system institutionalization is found to be hindered when cleavages cross-cut, while fostered in cases where they cumulate (i.e. coincide).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofParty politicsen
dc.titleParty systems and cleavage structures revisited : a sociological explanation of party system institutionalization in East Central Europeen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1354068811436042
dc.identifier.volume20en
dc.identifier.startpage16en
dc.identifier.endpage36en
dc.identifier.issue1en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record