Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDELLA PORTA, Donatella
dc.contributor.authorCERNISON, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-19T16:05:54Z
dc.date.available2015-03-19T16:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationPartecipazione e conflitto (new series), 2014, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 447-468en
dc.identifier.issn2035-6609
dc.identifier.issn1972-7623
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/35101
dc.description.abstractOutcomes of democratization paths have been addressed within literature on democratic consolidation as well as on revolution. These approaches have however never been linked with social movement theory that, I argue in this article, can provide new lenses to explain how movements’ characteristics at the time of transition might have an impact on the quality of ensuing democracy. As the same time, looking at effects of social movements in terms of democratization can help broadening social movement studies, that have rarely addressed this type of effects. I am in particular interested in linking reflections (and empirical evidence) on effects of social movements to the typology on paths towards democratization that I have developed in other works. Looking especially at Central Eastern Europe post-1989, I single out the different characteristics of contentious politics in countries that underwent, respectively, eventful democratization, participated pacts and troubled democratization. Protest event analysis as constituted the empirical basis for the analysis.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofPartecipazione e conflitto (new series)en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleCycles of protest and the consolidation of democracyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1285/i20356609v7i3p447
dc.identifier.volume7en
dc.identifier.startpage447en
dc.identifier.endpage468en
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record