Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMICKLITZ, Hans-Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-24T14:27:02Z
dc.date.available2015-03-24T14:27:02Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/35178
dc.description.abstractAre we, private lawyers and contract lawyers, not convinced that we share a common understanding of freedom of contract, of‚ freedom’, of ‚contract’, and of the restriction of freedom of contract through ‘regulation’? Is this common understanding not the basis on which we all operate – implicitly or explicitly – in our intellectual discourse while cutting across different legal traditions and different legal cultures? I argue that this common understanding is no more than a rather superficial ‘gentleman’s agreement’ which allows us to communicate with each other whilst maintaining our own preconceptions. In fact, there are different models of freedom of contract and regulation in Germany, France, the UK and the European legal order, each deeply ingrained in their respective intellectual history.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/269722
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2015/09en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Regulatory Private Law Project (ERPL-12)en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectFreedom of contracten
dc.subjectRegulationen
dc.subjectLegal theoryen
dc.subjectIntellectual historyen
dc.titleOn the intellectual history of freedom of contract and regulationen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record