Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorALMENDRAL, Violeta Ruiz
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-14T12:30:42Z
dc.date.available2015-04-14T12:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/35377
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses the actual implications that the current budgetary supervision legal framework (both in the EU Law and Member States) has had on the Economic Constitution. Although there are tangible implications for all EU Member States, and the EU as a whole, in this paper I will mainly focus in the Euro Area, where budgetary discipline rules have greater consequences. Budgetary discipline rules do not automatically entail austerity measures or undermine the powers of Parliaments, at least in theory. They have however probably had a crowding-out effect for the construction of a (real) economic union, in that measures to construct fiscal capacity and tax integration to discuss public spending or to attain a real banking union (to name just a few) have been watered down if not abandoned outright.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2015/12en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectEconomic constitutionen
dc.subjectBudgetary stabilityen
dc.subjectBudgetary supervisionen
dc.subjectMonetary unionen
dc.subjectPublic debten
dc.titleA myopic economic constitution? : controlling the debt and the deficit without fiscal integrationen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record