Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTHOMSEN, Lotte
dc.contributor.authorOBAIDI, Milan
dc.contributor.authorSHEEHY-SKEFFINGTON, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorKTEILY, Nour
dc.contributor.authorSIDANIUS, Jim
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-27T15:59:00Z
dc.date.available2015-04-27T15:59:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral and brain sciences, 2014, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 377-378en
dc.identifier.issn0140-525X
dc.identifier.issn1469-1825
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/35537
dc.descriptionPublished online: 26 August 2014en
dc.description.abstractThe psychology of suicide terrorism involves more than simply the psychology of suicide. Individual differences in social dominance orientation (SDO) interact with the socio-structural, political context to produce support for group-based dominance among members of both dominant and subordinate groups. This may help explain why, in one specific context, some people commit and endorse terrorism, whereas others do not.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral and brain sciencesen
dc.titleIndividual differences in relational motives? : interact with the political context to produce terrorism and terrorism-supporten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X13003579
dc.identifier.volume37en
dc.identifier.startpage377en
dc.identifier.endpage378en
dc.identifier.issue4en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record