Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSVANTESSON, Dan Jerker B.
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-03T14:41:43Z
dc.date.available2015-07-03T14:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/36317
dc.description.abstractFew legal decisions have gained greater academic and public scrutiny than has the Google Spain case and the facts of this so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ case are widely known. As could be expected, the CJEU’s decision of 2014 is legally technical and addresses a range of topics. Here, I will focus on those aspects of the judgment, and its (suggested) implementation, that has to do with jurisdiction. Those matters must be viewed in their proper context. To that end, this article places the discussion in the context of: (1) the ongoing European data privacy reform, (2) the considerable development of data privacy laws around the globe and (3) the general trend of jurisdictional overreach. Having done so, a Model Code Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Be Forgotten is presented and discussed.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2015/45en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFlorence School of Regulationen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Communications and Media]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectExtraterritorialityen
dc.subjectRight to be forgottenen
dc.subjectJurisdictionen
dc.subjectData privacyen
dc.subjectGoogle Spainen
dc.titleThe Google Spain case : Part of a harmful trend of jurisdictional overreachen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record