Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBELLAMY, Richard (Richard Paul)
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-23T12:51:15Z
dc.date.available2015-10-23T12:51:15Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEuropean law review, 2015, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 558-565en_US
dc.identifier.issn0307-5400
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/37358
dc.descriptionArticle first published online: 2 JUN 2015en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article disputes the recent argument of Dimitry Kochenov advocating an ‘EU Citizenship without Duties’. His thesis rests on an untenable form of philosophical anarchism that overlooks the role played by our political obligations to state structures in securing rights. At best, his argument suggests a ‘thin’ form of EU citizenship that allows European citizens to choose which of the Member States they wish to become morally obliged to. A ‘thicker’ form of EU level citizenship could only arise by creating civic obligations at the EU level, the position he rejects. To the extent certain Court of Justice judgments in this area reflect parallel reasoning to Kochenov's, they too suffer from a similar failure to appreciate the role of civic duties to particular Member States (or, eventually, the EU) in creating and securing the status of citizens as equal rights bearers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean law reviewen_US
dc.titleA duty free Europe? : what’s wrong with Kochenov's account of EU citizenship rightsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eulj.12142
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.startpage558en_US
dc.identifier.endpage565en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record