Republican Europe or constitutional choices of EU migration law
Title: Republican Europe or constitutional choices of EU migration law
Author: KOCHAROV, Anna
Citation: Florence : European University Institute, 2015
Series/Number: EUI PhD theses; Department of Law
Constitutions establish communities. This essay explores how a European political community can be advanced through EU constitutional law. It is shown that legitimacy of the Union derives from three conceptions of Peace manifest in EU free movement law, external agreements of the Union and migration law under the AFSJ. The constitutional role of the Union is to ensure Peace by addressing two types of conflict. The first are static conflicts of interests between the national polities in the EU. These are avoided by ensuring reciprocal non-interference between Member States in the Union through deregulation in Union law. The second are dynamic conflicts of ideas about positive liberty held by the peoples of Europe that can be resolved through regulation in a European political space. Here, Union law enables a continuous process of re-negotiating a shared European idea of positive liberty that can be accepted as own by each national polity in the EU. Both solutions are premised on liberty from domination of each national polity, from which legitimacy of the Union and the European political space ensue. Substantive law and constitutional theory, analysis of the legislative process and CJEU case law, insights from psychology and philosophy are combined throughout this work to unveil how a stronger Union can be advanced through constitutional law.
LC Subject Heading: Constitutional law -- European Union countries; Emigration and immigration law -- European Union countries; Freedom of movement -- European Union countries
Defence date: 18 September 2015; Examining Board: Professor Marise Cremona, European University Institute (Supervisor); Professor Dennis Patterson, European University Institute; Professor Elspeth Guild, Radbound University Nijmegen; Professor Anne Peters, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law.
Type of Access: embargoedAccess
Published version: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/46704