The fairness of contractual exchange in a private law society : early modern credit markets as a case study
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1614-9920; 1614-9939
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
European review of contract law, 2015, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 229-251
Cite
DERMINEUR, Elise, SVETIEV, Yane, The fairness of contractual exchange in a private law society : early modern credit markets as a case study, European review of contract law, 2015, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 229-251 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/38427
Abstract
Quite apart from the question of the justifiability – based on prior normative commitments – of legal rules controlling the substance of contractual exchange, such as a fair price rule, a common complaint against such rules is based on the difficulties of implementing and enforcing them. Rather than proceeding from first principles, it is also possible to examine the consequences of ex ante and ex post controls on the fairness of contractual exchange in contexts where they have been imposed before testing such consequences against any normative commitments. Such an approach allows both to examine whether practical constraints on enforcing rules over the fairness of exchange are truly binding and, even if they are, whether such rules can have other either beneficial or negative effects on parties and on contract law more broadly. We present a case study of credit markets in a rural community in early modern France marked by the relative absence of the State as a regulatory agent. Our analysis points to, even very provisionally, possible functions of a weak mandatory rule even when overinclusive and difficult to enforce.