Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorREHER, Stefanie 
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-29T16:16:09Z
dc.date.available2016-01-29T16:16:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of political research, 2015, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 160–181en
dc.identifier.issn0304-4130
dc.identifier.issn1475-6765
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/38768
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 4 December 2014en
dc.description.abstractPrevious research has shown that citizens tend to be more satisfied with the functioning of democracy when their ideological positions are more proximate to representatives'. This article argues that congruence in policy priorities between citizens and political elites should have a similar effect: citizens whose concerns are shared by elites should perceive them to be more attentive and responsive to public concerns and societal needs. Yet, the relationship might vary with differences in expectations towards democracy and representation. Specifically, it should be stronger in more democratic countries and older democracies. The hypotheses are empirically tested in a multilevel regression framework, where voter survey data from the 2009 European Election Study is linked with candidate survey data. The results indicate that citizens are indeed more satisfied with democracy if elites share their concerns, and the effect increases with democratic experience.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of political researchen
dc.titleExplaining cross-national variation in the relationship between priority congruence and satisfaction with democracyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1475-6765.12077
dc.identifier.volume54en
dc.identifier.startpage160en
dc.identifier.endpage181en
dc.identifier.issue1en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record