Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorFINGER, Matthias
dc.contributor.editorBERT, Nadia
dc.contributor.editorKUPFER, David
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-23T11:24:32Z
dc.date.available2016-02-23T11:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2467-0405
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/39126
dc.description.abstractAt the 2nd Florence Intermodal Forum policy makers, regulators, associations and operators of both the rail and the air transport sector came together to discuss current issues that impact both sectors alike. The central question was whether high-speed rail and low-cost air were competing or complementing modes of transport. After the liberalization of the European air market low-cost air carriers had taken over many medium length routes in Europe. High-speed rail could win back a lot of ground on many routes and remains dominant especially on city connection as illustrated by the Rome-Milan corridor example. The development is taking place against the background of an ongoing liberalization process in the rail market which has an important effect on innovation in the sector. Are the two modes serving different markets or are they in competition with each other? To what extent can they be complementary? What role does state aid play for each sector and how can policy work to address passenger needs?en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFlorence School of Regulationen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTransporten
dc.relation.ispartofseries2014/01en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean transport regulation observeren
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleHigh-speed rail vs. low-cost air : competing or complementary modes?en
dc.typeTechnical Report
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record