Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorANDRIGHETTO, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorGRIECO, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorTUMMOLINI, Luca
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T10:07:19Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T10:07:19Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in psychology, 2015, Vol. 6, Article 1413
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/39290
dc.descriptionPublished online: 6 October 2015
dc.description.abstractThree main motivations can explain compliance with social norms: fear of peer punishment, the desire for others' esteem and the desire to meet others' expectations. Though all play a role, only the desire to meet others' expectations can sustain compliance when neither public nor private monitoring is possible. Theoretical models have shown that such desire can indeed sustain social norms, but empirical evidence is lacking. Moreover it is unclear whether this desire ranges over others' “empirical” or “normative” expectations. We propose a new experimental design to isolate this motivation and to investigate what kind of expectations people are inclined to meet. Results indicate that, when nobody can assign either material or immaterial sanctions, the perceived legitimacy of others' normative expectations can motivate a significant number of people to comply with costly social norms.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in psychology
dc.relation.ispartofseries[EUDO]en
dc.relation.urihttp://www.frontiersin.org/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titlePerceived legitimacy of normative expectations motivates compliance with social norms when nobody is watching
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01413
dc.identifier.volume6
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record