Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHENRIOT, Arthur
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T10:07:24Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T10:07:24Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEnergy economics, 2015, Vol. 49(C), pp. 370-379
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/39318
dc.descriptionAvailable online 22 March 2015
dc.description.abstractIn a power system featuring a large share of intermittent renewables and inflexible thermal generators, efficiency gains could be achieved by curtailing the production of renewables. However, as renewables feature very low variable production costs, over-curtailment can be costly. In this article, we use a stylised analytical model to assess this trade-off. We show that while curtailing renewables when their variability is high and the system flexibility is low can reduce generation costs, the different stakeholders will not necessarily benefit from such measures. As a consequence, leaving this decision to generators will lead to a sub-optimal level of curtailment. Either incentives to provide accurate RES availability forecasts or alternatively centralised forecasting should be put into place to solve the resulting problem of asymmetry of information.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy economics
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Florence School of Regulation]
dc.titleEconomic curtailment of intermittent renewable energy sources
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.002
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record