Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMAVROIDIS, Petros C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T10:07:26Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T10:07:26Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationWorld trade review, 2015, Vol. 14, No. S1, pp. S107-S121
dc.identifier.issn1474-7456
dc.identifier.issn1475-3138
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/39332
dc.descriptionPublished online: 03 July 2015
dc.description.abstractPreferential trade agreements (PTAs) have to be consistent with the WTO. Their monitoring at the multilateral level has failed so far for various reasons. The question arises what to do? Completion of the contract (‘legalization’) has failed repeatedly, and, in light of vested interests and incentives, there is no reason to believe it can succeed now. Judicialization can be discarded as well, since the incentives to enforce the WTO contract in this respect are lacking. The good arguments thus lie in favour of building bridges between the WTO and PTAs, and the weaker arguments with an effort to enhance enforcement against PTAs through either judicialization or legalization of the monitoring process.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofWorld trade review
dc.titleDealing with PTAs in the WTO : falling through the cracks between 'judicialization' and 'legalization'
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1474745615000154
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.startpageS107
dc.identifier.endpageS121
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issueS1


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record