Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPORCHER, Simon
dc.contributor.authorPORCHER, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T17:20:21Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T17:20:21Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationApplied economics letters, 2014, Vol. 21, No. 15, pp. 1050-1053
dc.identifier.issn1350-4851
dc.identifier.issn1466-4291
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/39514
dc.description.abstractWhen studying oligopolies, a tension exists between models supporting tacit collusion and those supporting the noncollusive behaviour of firms. Using a panel on retail fuel margins in France over more than 20 years, we find mitigated evidence of collusive behaviour in the retail gasoline industry. On the one hand, we find lower margins when demand is expected to increase in the next period, which is a standard prediction for the noncooperative models. On the other hand, we also find evidence of tacit collusion as margins respond to input cost changes in the manner that the tacit collusion models predict: margins decline when the expected marginal cost increases. Our results leave open the question of collusion in the retail gasoline market.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofApplied economics letters
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Florence School of Regulation]en
dc.titleThe determinants of margins in French retail gasoline markets
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13504851.2014.907472
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.startpage1050
dc.identifier.endpage1053
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue15


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record