| dc.contributor.author | ROSE, Richard | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-11T16:52:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-03-11T16:52:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | European political science, 2013, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 102-105 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1680-4333 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1682-0983 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/39713 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In the 1960s Europeans were challenged to decide whether the abstractions being introduced by the behavioural revolution into political science constituted pretentious jargon or mistaken translation into "German-American" or added theoretical meaning . Richard Rose describes how, as an American with an Oxford doctorate, his critical scrutiny identified substantial additional value whereas Hans Daalder, a Dutchman socialized in the LSE mode of dismissing abstractions, tended to take the opposite view. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | European political science | |
| dc.title | Do words have meanings? | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 12 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 102 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 105 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |