The case for leverage : based corporate human rights responsibility
Title: The case for leverage : based corporate human rights responsibility
Author: WOOD, Stepan
Citation: Business ethics quarterly, 2012, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 63-98
ISSN: 1052-150X; 2153-3326
Should companies’ human rights responsibilities arise, in part, from their “leverage” – their ability to influence others’ actions through their relationships? Special Representative John Ruggie rejected this proposition in the United Nations Framework for business and human rights. I argue that leverage is a source of responsibility where there is a morally significant connection between the company and a rights-holder or rights-violator, the company is able to make a contribution to ameliorating the situation, it can do so at modest cost, and the threat to human rights is substantial. In such circumstances companies have a responsibility to exercise leverage even though they did nothing to contribute to the situation. Such responsibility is qualified, not categorical; graduated, not binary; context-specific; practicable; consistent with the social role of business; and not merely a negative responsibility to avoid harm but a positive responsibility to do good.
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.