dc.contributor.author | VAUCHEZ, Antoine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-14T14:50:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-14T14:50:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | European law journal, 2010, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-28 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1468-0386 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/40040 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article tracks the genesis of one of the EU's most established meta-narratives, that of Europeanisation-through-case-law. Instead of studying this theory of European integration as an explanatory frame, I consider what is at stake in its genesis as a dominant frame of understanding of Europeanisation. I trace its emergence in the conflicting theorisations of the relationship between law and the European Communities that come along with the ECJ's ‘landmark’ decisions (Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL). This approach helps seize the genesis of a specific and—at the time—rather unlikely political model for Europe in which a Court (the ECJ) is regarded as the very locus of European integration's dynamics as well as the best mediator and moderator of both Member States' ‘conservatism’ and individuals' ‘potential excesses’. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.ispartof | European law journal | |
dc.title | The transnational politics of judicialization : Van Gend en Loos and the making of EU polity | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00494.x | |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 28 | |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |