Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVAUCHEZ, Antoine
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-14T14:50:50Z
dc.date.available2016-03-14T14:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationEuropean law journal, 2010, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-28
dc.identifier.issn1468-0386
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/40040
dc.description.abstractThis article tracks the genesis of one of the EU's most established meta-narratives, that of Europeanisation-through-case-law. Instead of studying this theory of European integration as an explanatory frame, I consider what is at stake in its genesis as a dominant frame of understanding of Europeanisation. I trace its emergence in the conflicting theorisations of the relationship between law and the European Communities that come along with the ECJ's ‘landmark’ decisions (Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL). This approach helps seize the genesis of a specific and—at the time—rather unlikely political model for Europe in which a Court (the ECJ) is regarded as the very locus of European integration's dynamics as well as the best mediator and moderator of both Member States' ‘conservatism’ and individuals' ‘potential excesses’.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean law journal
dc.titleThe transnational politics of judicialization : Van Gend en Loos and the making of EU polity
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00494.x
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.endpage28
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record