Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCALENDA, Davide
dc.contributor.authorMEIJER, Albert
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-15T13:46:00Z
dc.date.available2016-03-15T13:46:00Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationInformation, communication & society, 2011, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 660-683
dc.identifier.issn1369-118X
dc.identifier.issn1468-4462
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/40157
dc.descriptionPublished online: 31 January 2011
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, the authors define political individualization as a form of networked individualism. This process consists of two components: social individualization and political networking. Social individualization means that people are becoming less strongly connected to traditional communities and experiencing highly differentiated sociability. Political networking refers to the shift from stable connections to formal political movements to dynamic connections to issue networks. This article attempts to investigate whether this process of political individualization is positively related to the use of new media such as the Internet and mobile telephones. There could be two arguments why these two would be positively related. First, the use of new media drives political individualization; the use of new media stimulates individualization since it creates opportunities for individuals to create social connections outside of existing communities. New media also facilitate the formation of political networks. Second, the use of new media and political individualization are both manifestations of a broader process of societal change. The process of modernization results in increasing autonomy of individuals and growing use of technology. This paper does not test these two explanations but rather investigates whether the grounds for both arguments actually exist. The authors have formulated the following research question: Do the new media create opportunities for political individualization and how are these opportunities used? Data from an international survey (918 web questionnaires) of young people in two European cities – Florence and Utrecht – has been used to investigate the research question.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofInformation, communication & society
dc.titlePolitical individualization
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1369118X.2010.516365
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.startpage660
dc.identifier.endpage683
dc.identifier.issue5


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record