Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGAVARD, Claire
dc.contributor.authorWINCHESTER, Niven
dc.contributor.authorJACOBY, Henry
dc.contributor.authorPALTSEV, Sergey
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-15T13:46:18Z
dc.date.available2016-03-15T13:46:18Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/40265
dc.description.abstractIn recent United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations, sectoral mechanisms were proposed as a way to encourage early action and spur investment in low carbon technologies in developing countries, particularly in the electricity sector. Sectoral trading, which is one such proposition, involves including a sector from one or more nations in an international cap-and-trade system. In order to assess potential impacts from such a mechanism, we analyze trade in carbon permits between the Chinese electricity sector and a U.S. economy-wide cap-and-trade program using the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model. We find that this sectoral policy induces significant financial transfers between the two countries. In 2030, the U.S. purchases permits valued at $42 billion from China, which represents more than 46% of its capped emissions. Despite these transfers, there is only a small change in Chinese welfare. In the U.S., the availability of relatively cheap emissions permits significantly reduces the cost of climate policy. In China, sectoral trading increases the price of electricity and reduces the amount of electricity generated, particularly from coal, while opposite effects are observed in the U.S. Despite increases in the price of electricity in China, only small increases in electricity generation from nuclear and renewables are projected in the timeframe of our analysis (2010- 2030). Because the price of coal decree ses, we also find that sectoral trading leads to emissions increases in non-electricity sectors in China, a form of internal carbon leakage.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Global Science Policy Change Reporten
dc.relation.ispartofseries2011/193en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Florence School of Regulation]en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Climate]en
dc.relation.urihttp://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt193.pdf
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleWhat to expect from sectoral trading : a U.S.-China example
dc.typeTechnical Report
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record