Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTHYM, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T13:51:10Z
dc.date.available2016-04-19T13:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/40824
dc.description.abstractScholarship on EU law is well established but arguably lacks sensitivity to the methodological characteristics of transnational discourse. The defining features of the supranational legal order are more fluid than those of domestic legal systems and, moreover, academic debates occur in different languages. This contribution highlights the limits of transnational debates about EU law through a quantitative assessment of both citation practices and the geographical spread of authorship in specialised law journals. Against that background, it uses the example of Germany to designate areas defining national specificities in the methodological approach towards EU law. In doing so, this contribution considers language regimes, publication formats, the role of legal education and practice, the relative weight of theoretical and doctrinal approaches, as well as interaction with international and constitutional law.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2016/14en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectAcademic researchen
dc.subjectEU lawen
dc.subjectLanguagesen
dc.subjectMethodologyen
dc.subjectLegal culturesen
dc.titleThe limits of transnational scholarship on EU law : a view from Germanyen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record