Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBAUBÖCK, Rainer
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T10:18:17Z
dc.date.available2016-06-21T10:18:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationComparative migration studies, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-6 (Article 10)en
dc.identifier.issn2214-594X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/41904
dc.descriptionReceived: 15 March 2016, Accepted: 23 March 2016, Published: 20 June 2016en
dc.description.abstractWill Kymlicka invokes solidarity within the nation, which has a progressive potential when it includes culturally diverse groups into a national We and when it can be mobilized against class privilege. Kymlicka is concerned that these two goals may conflict with each other and hopes that national solidarity can mitigate the conflict. This commentary argues that progressives are faced not with a dilemma, but with a trilemma involving the partially conflicting goals of relative openness for immigration, integration in a culturally diverse society and solidaristic redistribution and expresses skepticism that liberal nationalism provides adequate responses.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringerOpenen
dc.relation.ispartofComparative migration studiesen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleWhy liberal nationalism does not resolve the progressive’s trilemma : comment on Will Kymlicka’s article 'Solidarity in diverse societies'en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40878-016-0031-1
dc.identifier.volume4en
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.endpage6en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons CC BY 4.0


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons CC BY 4.0