Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRUFFA, Chiara
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-07T08:34:45Z
dc.date.available2016-07-07T08:34:45Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationPerspectives on federalism, 2009, Vol. 1, pp. 68-96
dc.identifier.issn2036-5438
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/42204
dc.description.abstractAfter the end of the Cold War, peacekeeping operations have increasingly been launched by new actors (such as regional organizations and ad hoc coalitions) despite the continued and important role of the United Nations. What do major regional powers prefer? Do they opt for the UN, for 'coalitions of the willing', or for regional organizations when establishing peacekeeping missions? And do they tend to prefer one of the three? In this paper, I argue that major regional powers tend to deploy their troops with regional organizations or 'coalitions of the willing' when launching peacekeeping operations; I also try to develop possible explanations for this phenomenon. This research can make a contribution in an almost unexplored field of the literature and it can also tell us more about how core principles of peacekeeping are being modified by the emerging role of new actors.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofPerspectives on federalism
dc.titleWhat color for the helmet? : major regional powers and their preferences for UN, regional or ad hoc coalition peace operations
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume1
dc.identifier.startpage68
dc.identifier.endpage96
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record