Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZILLER, Jacques
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-07T08:34:53Z
dc.date.available2016-07-07T08:34:53Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationEuropean public law, 2010, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 53-73
dc.identifier.issn1354-3725
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/42242
dc.description.abstractNovel features of the VerfG's judgment in relation to the previous 'solange' and Maastricht jurisprudence are: (1) the very strong link between democracy and sovereignty in the implementation of the principle of conferral; and (2) the indication that the Constitutional court will be the sole interpreter of what constitutes Germany's constitutional identity. The Court does not indicate what would happen in procedural terms if it were to find a provision of EU law in contradiction with Germany's constitutional identity or which would not respect the principle of conferral. This writer's view is that the only correct way to solve such an issue would be for a Constitutional court to refer to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling on the invalidity of such a provision.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean public law
dc.titleThe German Constitutional Court's Friendliness towards European Law : on the judgment of Bundesverfassungsgericht over the Ratifi cation of the Treaty of Lisbon
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.startpage53
dc.identifier.endpage73
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record