Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCLOSA, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-16T14:56:23Z
dc.date.available2016-12-16T14:56:23Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/44487
dc.description.abstractArticle 50 has explicitly formalized the exit option that previously existed in an implicit form. The provision entitles to an unilateral, unconditional but not immediate withdrawal from the European Union which renders relatively easy in procedural terms to trigger the process. Several utilitarian reasons explain why a member state may wish to leave an organization such as the EU although in the case of the UK 2016 referendum none of them seem to have played a major role. Building on this background and Joseph Weilerメs 1999 seminal contribution on the transformation of Europe, this paper argues that the formalization of the withdrawal provision undermines loyalty (understood as the proclivity to resolve losses of organizational efficiency within the organization) which is at the very basis of the EU project.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2016/71en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-246en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean, Transnational and Global Governanceen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectArticle 50en
dc.subjectWithdrawal from the EUen
dc.subjectBrexiten
dc.subjectExit voice and loyaltyen
dc.subject.otherEuropean governance
dc.subject.otherEuropean identities and culture
dc.titleInterpreting Article 50 : exit and voice and what about loyalty?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record