Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPAPACONSTANTINOU, George A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-19T14:11:48Z
dc.date.available2016-12-19T14:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationEuropean review of contract law, 2016, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 356-390en
dc.identifier.issn1614-9939
dc.identifier.issn1614-9920
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/44512
dc.descriptionPublished Online: 13 Dec 2016en
dc.description.abstractThis article sheds light on the new legal treatment of inducements, under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, and seeks to address the question whether or not that regime is beneficial for market participants. Inducements constitute a common practice of day-to-day conduct of business by financial institutions. Accordingly, the rules that define their realm of operation are quintessential for both investment firms and investors. The relevant paradigm of conflicts of interest is used. MiFID II has to be implemented only by 3 January 2018. However, the forthcoming regime on inducements derives from gold-plating practices that are already in place in the UK. An examination and assessment of the impact of inducements policy and their adverse effect on retail investors in the UK is an adequate apparatus to draw parallels from. After highlighting the inherent problems of the EU provisions on inducements, an enhanced framework is designed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean review of contract lawen
dc.titleInvestment bankers in conflict : the regime of inducements in MiFID II and the member states' struggle for fairnessen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ercl-2016-0019
dc.identifier.volume12en
dc.identifier.startpage356en
dc.identifier.endpage390en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue4en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record