Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-17T10:00:52Z
dc.date.available2017-01-17T10:00:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMarc BUNGENBERG, Christoph HERRMANN, Markus KRAJEWSKI and Jörg Philipp TERHECHTE (eds), European yearbook of international economic law 2016, [s.l.] : Springer international publishing, 2016, European Yearbook of International Economic Law ; 7, pp. 45-65
dc.identifier.isbn9783319292151
dc.identifier.isbn9783319292144
dc.identifier.issn2364-8392
dc.identifier.issn2364-8406
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/44792
dc.description.abstractThis short comment on the preceding article by Prof. Schneiderman calls for the clarification of legal methodologies in research on international economic law (IEL) and on the 'constitutionalisation' of multilevel governance of international public goods (PGs). While European lawyers and courts throughout Europe accept the 'constitutionalisation' of European economic law and human rights law (HRL) as legal facts and normative challenges, legal discourse about 'constitutionalisation' of UN and WTO law and governance remains contested and often confusing due to inadequate clarification of legal terminologies, research methods and diverse conceptions of international law and multilevel governance of PGs.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleFrom fragmentation to constitutionalisation of international economic law? : comments on Schneiderman's constitutionalismen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_3
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record