Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFRANCIONI, Francesco
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-23T12:58:44Z
dc.date.available2017-01-23T12:58:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationThe international spectator : Italian journal of international affairs, 2016, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 19-29en
dc.identifier.issn0393-2729
dc.identifier.issn1751-9721
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/44952
dc.descriptionPublished online: 28 Jun 2016en
dc.description.abstractTen years after its formal adoption, the R2P doctrine remains an incomplete project in a world of continuing conflicts now aggravated by the existential threat of global terrorism. The debate on the permissibility of military action to stop mass atrocities when authorisation to use force is not forthcoming from the Security Council has produced only a plurality of conflicting theories but hardly any progress at the normative level. A two-pronged approach could be used to consolidate R2P as a doctrine fully integrated into the corpus of international law. The first prong requires the revamping of the largely neglected Article 48 of the ILC Draft on State Responsibility; the second involves using R2P as a platform to initiate a reform of customary international law to make it more consistent with elementary principles of justice and universal human rights.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofThe international spectator : Italian journal of international affairsen
dc.titleResponsibility to protect in the age of global terror : a methodological reassessmenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03932729.2016.1154376
dc.identifier.volume51en
dc.identifier.startpage19en
dc.identifier.endpage29en
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record