Open Access
Protecting fundamental values in the European Union through the rule of law : articles 2 and 7 TEU from a legal, historical and comparative angle
Loading...
Files
RSCAS_Ebook_Wilms_EU_RuleOfLaw_2017.pdf (2.37 MB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Florence : European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 2017
Cite
WILMS, Günter, Protecting fundamental values in the European Union through the rule of law : articles 2 and 7 TEU from a legal, historical and comparative angle, Florence : European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 2017 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/44987
Abstract
The present study combines practical experience with the implementation of Union law ‘on the ground’ with an academic approach. It intends to facilitate the interpretation of the fundamental values mentioned in Article 2 TEU and their main enforcement mechanism, Article 7 TEU, by putting them in a historical and comparative context. Both prove the importance of ‘homogeneity-provisions’ and their enforcement but also illustrate how rarely similar clauses have been used in other multilayer systems. From a practical perspective, the study shows the dilemma the Commission faces when confronted with the question whether to commence a formal procedure under Article 7 TEU. It has two options: either it opens the formal procedure or not. In the first scenario the initiative either finds the necessary majority in the Council/European (Commission ‘gets it right’) or it does not (Commission would be overdoing it, “false positive”). In the second scenario, it could happen that the necessary majorities for Article 7 TEU could have been obtained (“false negative”). The present study gives examples for all three outcomes (Weimar, Wallace and Vienna) and illustrates their consequences. It also shows alternative ways for the enforcement of the Fundamental Values protected by Article 2 TEU such as the infringement procedure under Article 258 TEU.
Table of Contents
-- Foreword p.1;
-- First Part: Basic Issues Concerning the Protection of the Fundamental Values in the European Union p2;
-- I. Introduction p.3;
-- II. The Rule of Law in the European Union: Basic Concepts p.4; Endnotes p7;
-- Second Part: Rules on values, homogeneity and their enforcement in other multi-layer systems p11;
-- I. Introduction p12;
-- II. Homogeneity Clauses in (quasi-)Federal States p.12;
-- III. Homogeneity clauses and their enforcement in regional international organisations p.25;
-- IV. Conclusions p.35;
-- Endnotes p.36;
-- Third Part: The Rule of Law and its Protection by the European Union p.56;
-- I. The Rule of Law under Article 2 TEU p.57;
-- II.Enforcement of The Rule of Law in the European Union by means of Article 7 TEU p.58;
-- III. Analysis of the Commission’s practice with regard to protecting the Rule of Law p.68;
-- IV. Can the ECJ play a more active Role in the Protection of the Rule of Law de lege lata? p.81;
-- V. Conclusions p.82;
-- Endnotes p.83;
-- Bibliography p.104