Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTSOURDI, Evangelia (Lilian)
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-20T15:14:07Z
dc.date.available2017-02-20T15:14:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationRefugee survey quarterly, 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 7-28en
dc.identifier.issn1020-4067
dc.identifier.issn1471-695X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/45402
dc.descriptionPublished: 02 February 2016en
dc.description.abstractThis article critically assesses the amended European Union asylum detention framework. It traces the tension reflected in the regime between protection provision and administrative imperatives, such as migration management. The research argues that the amended legislation closely frames asylum detention. A coherent regional understanding of “alternatives to asylum detention” also emerges from the legal framework. These elements have the potential to advance protection of forced migrants at global and regional levels. However, European Union asylum law also carries within it the risk of undermining protection. The research explores in this respect the broadly phrased detention grounds and advances an interpretation on the basis of Member States’ international and regional (Council of Europe) legal obligations.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofRefugee survey quarterlyen
dc.titleAsylum detention in EU law : falling between two stools?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/rsq/hdv021
dc.identifier.volume35en
dc.identifier.startpage7en
dc.identifier.endpage28en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record