Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMEIJER, Hugo 
dc.contributor.authorBERAUD-SUDREAU, Lucie
dc.contributor.authorHOLTROM, Paul
dc.contributor.authorUTTLEY, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T15:06:01Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T15:06:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of strategic studies, 2018, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 850-886en
dc.identifier.issn0140-2390
dc.identifier.issn1743-937X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/45687
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 24 February 2017en
dc.description.abstractThe rise of China has been fuelled by a massive military modernisation programme relying, in large part, on the acquisition of foreign military equipment. The question of how the world’s major powers define their arms transfer policies towards China is therefore crucially important. This article makes two original contributions. First, drawing on neoclassical realism, it proposes an explanatory framework integrating international and domestic factors to explain variations in major powers’ arms transfers. Second, based on a large body of elite interviews and diplomatic cables, it offers the first comprehensive comparison of American, British, French and Russian arms transfer policies towards China since the end of the Cold War.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of strategic studiesen
dc.titleArming China : major powers’ arms transfers to the People’s Republic of Chinaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01402390.2017.1288110
dc.identifier.volume41en
dc.identifier.startpage850en
dc.identifier.endpage886en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue6en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record