dc.contributor.author | GARNER, Oliver | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-10T16:34:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-10T16:34:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | European journal of legal studies, 2017, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1-12 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1973-2937 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/46065 | |
dc.description.abstract | Amid the political turmoil following the United Kingdom's popular vote on 'Brexit', the United Kingdom Supreme Court has recently handed down its highly-anticipated ruling in Miller. This judgment conveys remarkable insights about the United Kingdom Supreme Court's perception of the relationship between the national and European legal orders. We invited Oliver Garner, a Ph.D. researcher at the Law Department of the European University Institute working on the legal ramifications of 'Brexit' and an editor of our journal, to write an editorial on the implications of this ruling. Oliver puts the ruling in a broader perspective, comparing it to two other recent national court decisions: Dansk Industri from the Danish Supreme Court and Taricco from the Italian Constitutional Court. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | European University Institute | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | European journal of legal studies | en |
dc.relation.uri | https://ejls.eui.eu/ | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.title | The borders of European integration on trial in the Member States : Dansk Industri, Miller, and Taricco | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | en |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 14 | en |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en |