Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGARNER, Oliver
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T16:34:53Z
dc.date.available2017-04-10T16:34:53Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of legal studies, 2017, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1-12en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/46065
dc.description.abstractAmid the political turmoil following the United Kingdom's popular vote on 'Brexit', the United Kingdom Supreme Court has recently handed down its highly-anticipated ruling in Miller. This judgment conveys remarkable insights about the United Kingdom Supreme Court's perception of the relationship between the national and European legal orders. We invited Oliver Garner, a Ph.D. researcher at the Law Department of the European University Institute working on the legal ramifications of 'Brexit' and an editor of our journal, to write an editorial on the implications of this ruling. Oliver puts the ruling in a broader perspective, comparing it to two other recent national court decisions: Dansk Industri from the Danish Supreme Court and Taricco from the Italian Constitutional Court.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleThe borders of European integration on trial in the Member States : Dansk Industri, Miller, and Tariccoen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume9en
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.endpage14en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record