Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCOOPER, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-21T15:45:03Z
dc.date.available2017-09-21T15:45:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationParliamentary affairs, 2017, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 655-672en
dc.identifier.issn0031-2290
dc.identifier.issn1460-2482
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/48025
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 12 July 2017en
dc.description.abstractThis article undertakes a critical analysis of the idea of a separate parliamentary chamber for the Eurozone. Beyond the difficulty of determining the composition and powers of such a chamber, it is argued that any attempt to establish a system of differentiated parliamentary representation would encounter the quandary of exclusion: it is difficult to justify excluding non-Eurozone states altogether, but equally difficult to decide which non-Eurozone states to include. This problem is illustrated with a survey of the great variation among non-Eurozone Member States in their adherence to the institutional elements of the EU’s post-crisis economic governance regime, and with an account of the debates over participation in the one new EU parliamentary body in this field, the Interparliamentary Conference on Stability, Economic Coordination and Governance. Finally, there are reflections about the likely impact of Brexit on this problem.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofParliamentary affairsen
dc.titleA separate parliament for the Eurozone? : differentiated representation, Brexit, and the quandary of exclusionen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pa/gsx022
dc.identifier.volume70
dc.identifier.startpage655
dc.identifier.endpage672
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue4


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record